Gender Clinic News

Published on March 18, 2025
by Inspecting Gender
Original: The EU’s Stealth Push for Trans Ideology Exposed

If you thought USAID’s promotion of trans ideology was bad, wait till you see what’s unfolding in the EU.

Thanks to DOGE, Americans have uncovered USAID’s multimillion-dollar efforts to push gender ideology—efforts that stayed discreet until recently. The European Union’s quieter campaign, however, has dodged similar exposure. Yesterday, Genspect’s Stella O’Malley joined sociologist Ashley Frawley and political scientist Faika El-Nagashi at an MCC Brussels event to tackle a pressing question: Does gender self-identification threaten women’s rights and child safety?

The EU’s drive to weave gender policies into its legal and social frameworks, epitomized by the LGBTIQ Equality Strategy (2020-2025), hinges on self-ID—allowing individuals to define their “gender identity” and alter official documents without medical, legal, or external validation. While proponents frame it as progressive, a damning new MCC report by Frawley, released today, exposes the EU’s role in fueling gender ideology’s rise, eroding the rights of children, women, and democratic principles.

Stella O’Malley: Kids as Collateral

Stella O’Malley kicked off the discussion by dissecting why today’s adolescents are uniquely vulnerable. She argued that self-ID arrests identity formation and amplifies puberty’s natural distress, creating a pipeline that funnels kids into trans ideology. Vulnerable youth, wrestling with identity or emotional turmoil, are prime targets for activist narratives peddling self-declaration as empowerment. Without gatekeeping, especially as parental authority is undermined, kids are fast-tracked to life-altering choices like hormones or surgeries before they can grasp the consequences. O’Malley cited evidence: 80% of children distressed at the onset of puberty resolve it if given time to adapt to their maturing bodies and sexual awakening. The EU’s policies, she warned, prioritize ideology over developmental psychology, exploiting youthful malleability and raising ethical alarms about consent and harm.

Stealth and Suppression: El-Nagashi’s Revelation

Faika El-Nagashi then exposed the EU’s tactical sleight of hand. Gender ideology, she said, never announces itself outright but piggybacks on women’s and LGB rights, masquerading trans inclusion as progressive continuity. This deliberate sidestep of scrutiny leverages established moral capital to push a broader agenda. Worse, it is paired with suppression: dissent is branded hate speech, debates are silenced, and fear stifles critique. Self-ID and its accompanying policies are not anti-discrimination. they are an assault on women’s and girls’ protections and a redefinition that erases same-sex attraction. El-Nagashi called it a bureaucratic power grab, a creeping authoritarianism under a rainbow flag, hostile to Europe’s people and democratic norms.

Evidence of Erosion: Frawley’s Report

Ashley Frawley unveiled her MCC report (aptly titled “Mission Creeps”) showing how self-ID jeopardizes sex-based protections across life’s spheres. In sports, biological males competing against women undermine fairness; in prisons and shelters, housing trans women with biological females sparks safety fears; in everyday facilities like toilets and changing rooms, privacy norms are shattered—with women powerless to object. She spotlighted the obsession with children and youth: activists, unable to fix societal ills, are remaking childhood around their agenda. The report also reveals the EU’s vast spending to promote gender ideology, not just within its borders but globally, including Africa along the lines of USAID but with less visibility.

Ideology Over Reason

The discussion raised urgent questions: Can the human rights language, co-opted by activists, be reclaimed to defend biology and tradition? How can free speech survive when critics are marginalized, events shut down (activists tried to stop this one), and dissent labeled hate speech? Unlike the U.S., where DOGE is unmasking USAID’s spending, the EU’s opacity persists. Frawley’s report is a start, but the path forward is murky—many organizations pushing gender ideology also serve worthwhile roles. Can they be salvaged? As Frawley argued, the hour is late, and it will take nothing less than a social movement to reroute the next generation from these disastrous, activist-laid paths.

Watch and Read More

  • Watch the recording of the discussion here.
  • Read Ashley Frawley’s report here.
  • Read Faika El-Nagashi’s contributions to Inspecting Gender here and here.
  • Watch Frank Furedi’s talk at The Bigger Picture Conference here.

Massive EU Funding for Gender Identity NGOs

  • The EU has allocated at least €221 million to NGOs promoting gender identity ideology over the last decade.
  • €40.5 million has gone to the most radical transgender advocacy groups.
  • €64.95 million was allocated solely to ILGA worldwide, a leading gender identity advocacy group.
  • Major benefciaries include:
    • ILGA-Europe (€16 million, plus €65 million to its international arm)
    • IGLYO (€6 million)
    • Transgender Europe (TGEU) (€4.6 million)
    • EuroCentralAsianLesbian Community (€6.2 million)
    • Organisation Intersex International Europe (€1.2 million)
  • At least €26 million has been used to fund activist-driven research promoting gender identity ideology.

Read Ashley Frawley’s report: Mission Creeps – How EU Funding and Activist NGOs Captured the Gender Agenda

See also: Breaking – EU Court of Auditors Exposes Systemic Opacity, Cronyism in NGO Funding – Transparency “Practically Impossible”

Share This